Paula Salinger Fraud on the Court: State Law Violations, Moral Turpitude Acts Documented In Court Filing

SCBA Family Law Executive Committee Officer Paula Salinger Moral Turpitude Acts Detailed In Leaked Court Memorandum

Friday Document Dump

Serial court rule and state law violations by Woodruff, O'Hair, Posner and Salinger partner Paula Salinger are detailed in this memorandum filed in Sacramento Family Court, and embedded below.  

The misconduct constitutes moral turpitude, violates Business & Professions Code § 6106, and provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, according to the State Bar, and other legal references. 

Paula Salinger holds the office of temporary judge in Sacramento County Superior Court and is an officer of the Sacramento County Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee. This is the second document in a two document set. The first document includes additional information about the case. To view the first document, click here. For additional articles about the people and issues in this post, click the corresponding labels below the document. 

Divorce Attorney Paula Salinger Fraud on the Court: SCBA Family Law Section Officer & Judge Pro Tem Files Non-Conforming Court Documents - Clerks Ignore

Sacramento Superior Court Clerks File Illegal, Non-Conforming Documents for Judge Pro Tem Attorneys

Court watchdogs assert that local divorce lawyers receive
preferential treatment from Sacramento Superior Court
judges, clerks and court employees.

Friday Document Dump

As the whistleblower leaked document embedded at the bottom of this post details, Sacramento Superior Court clerks file paperwork for SCBA Family Law Section attorneys which, by law, they are required to reject for filing. 

The document details multiple violations of the state law requirements for filing documents in all California courts committed by attorney and Sacramento Superior Court temporary judge Paula Salinger. 

The California Rules of Court specify the format of papers filed with every court in the state. The rules are mandatory, not optional. Under rule 2.118, court clerks must reject any papers that do not comply with court rules. Click here to view the rule. 

For example, under rule 2.108, line numbers must be placed in the left margin of papers filed with a court. 

The line numbers are critical because in order to make written objections to false or inadmissible evidence contained in a declaration filed by an attorney, by law the opposing party must specify the line numbers to show exactly which portions of the declaration contain defective evidence. If inaccurate evidence is not objected to it is by law considered accurate. 

The objections also are critical in any subsequent appeal, according to veteran Sacramento family law attorney Stephen James Wagner. Family court watchdogs have documented that declarations filed by attorneys often contain false or otherwise inadmissible evidence - which becomes admissible if objections are not lodged.

To continue reading, and view the responsive declaration documenting serial court rule violations by SCBA Family Law Executive Committee officer and judge pro tem attorney Paula Salinger, click Read more >> below...