Family Court News Sacramento, Family Relations Courthouse: Sacramento Superior Court - Family Court: Sacramento Superior Court - Family and Children - Family Court Services - Sacramento Superior Court - Child Custody Recommending Counseling, Family Court Services, Confidential Mediation, and Evaluation - Family Court Self-Help Center: Sacramento Superior Court - Self-Help Center - Family Law Facilitator - Family Court Records: Sacramento Superior Court - Order a File and Records - Family Court Resource Referral Program: Sacramento Superior Court - Resource Referral Program - E-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance) - Family Law Facilitator - Divorce / Legal Separation / Annulment: Sacramento Superior Court - Divorce / Legal Separation / Annulment - Family Law - Court Appearances: Sacramento Superior Court - Court Hearings and Orders - Child Custody / Visitation: Sacramento Superior Court - Child Custody / Visitation - Family Relations Courthouse: Sacramento Superior Court - William R. Ridgeway Family Relations Courthouse - Public Case Document Search - Sacramento Superior Court - Civil Motions and Hearings General: Sacramento Superior Court - Complex Case Calendar: Sacramento Superior Court - Gordon D. Schaber Sacramento County Courthouse: Sacramento Superior Court –
Sacramento Family Court News is a nonprofit journalism organization publishing original, independent news, aggregated news, news analysis, opinion, satire, and parody. 
Sacramento Family Court News is a nonprofit journalism organization publishing original, independent news, aggregated news, news analysis, opinion, satire and parody. Unlike the Sacramento Bee, Daily Journal Corporation publications, and local broadcast media we are independent of corporate, shareholder, advertiser and government influence. 

To ensure continued access to Judicial Branch employee sources, many reporters at mainstream news outlets will avoid coverage of controversial issues. Rolling Stone investigative reporter Matt Taibbi has pointed out that political journalism "has been reduced to an access-trading game, where reporters are rewarded for favorable coverage of those in the know with more time and availability." 

For example, as we exclusively reported, the Sacramento Bee in multiple stories in 2008-2009 covered up the temporary judge status of a family law attorney charged with 13-criminal counts, including sexual battery and penetration with a foreign object against clients and potential clients. Click here to read our report. 

The lawyer was a sworn temporary judge in Sacramento County Superior Court and as judge pro tem presided over settlement conferences at the family relations courthouse, yet by the Bee was misleadingly portrayed as a rogue, outlier divorce attorney with no connection to family court operations. 

The national family law website, familylawcourts.com also has called out the Bee and its reporters for protecting judges by refusing to identify them by name in its rare coverage of family court controversies. Click here and here. Our independence from outside influence allows SFCN to investigate and publish the stories that the self-censoring Judicial Branch legal community and mainstream media often are reluctant to report. 
Director of Operations Julie Setzer – Supervising Family Law Facilitator Lollie Roberts – Family Court Manager Colleen McDonagh - Hon. Jaime R. Roman – Hon. Matthew J. Gary – Hon. Thadd A. Blizzard – Hon. James M. Mize – Hon. Peter J. McBrien – Hon. Kevin R. Culhane – Hon. Laurie M. Earl – Hon. Steve White – Hon. Sharon A. Lueras -– Supervising Courtroom Clerk Denise Richards – Supervising Family Law and Probate Judge Jaime R. Roman - Hon. Laurie M. Earl Presiding Judge – Sacramento County Superior Court Court Executive Officer Christina Volkers - Sacramento Family Court News – child support – child custody – spousal support - Sacramento County Superior Court – Family Court Sacramento -Chris Volkers Court Executive Officer - Family Court Sacramento –Hon. Bunmi O. Awoniyi – Hon. Eugene L. Balonon - Scott P. Harmon Commissioner -  Danny L. Haukedalen Commissoner – Hon. Jane Ure – domestic violence
Sacramento Bee reporter Andy Furillo is assigned to cover Sacramento County courts. 
Family court watchdogs assert that Furillo has for years ignored important newsworthy 
events - including family court employee whistleblower Emily Gallup's successful 
lawsuit in Sacramento Superior Court - and in some cases whitewashed coverage 
to protect court administrators and maintain his access to government sources.
Like ProPublica, much of our work is public interest investigative journalism that "shines a light on the exploitation of the weak by the strong and on the failures of those in power to vindicate the trust placed in them." 

We report on virtually all Sacramento Family Law Court issues including divorce, child custody and visitation, child and spousal support, attorney fees and sanctions, court procedure and policy, and appeals from family court. 

We cover the financial and socioeconomic power imbalances often prevalent in family court cases. Oligarchical factions exert significant influence over many government institutions in California, and Sacramento Family Court is no exception. Socioeconomically disadvantaged court users often are treated as second-class citizens by the court, which operates a two-track system of justice providing preferential treatment to litigants who can afford representation by members of the Sacramento County Bar Association Family Law Sectionaccording to evidence compiled by family court watchdogs and whistleblowers.
"As a litigator who practiced for more than a decade in federal and state courts across the country, I've long been aware of the inequities that pervade the American justice system. The rich enjoy superior legal representation and therefore much better prospects for success in court than the poor. The powerful are treated with more deference by judges than the powerless. The same cultural, socioeconomic, and demographic biases that plague society generally also infect the legal process. Few people who have had any interaction with the justice system would dispute this." With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful, by Glenn Greenwald.   
If you are new to the Sacramento Family Court News site, we recommend reading our special Color of Law series of investigative reports documenting systemic family court problems, most involving cases where indigent, unrepresented litigants face-off against experienced divorce lawyers. Click here to view the Color of Law series. 

Our contributors include reporter P.R. Brown, news analysis and opinion writer PelicanBriefed, and our resident satire and parody humorist, RoadDog, who we unchain on Sundays to take the edge off our more serious Monday-Friday content. Due to our ties to the family law legal community and the nature of our work - which is considered by some in the community as a breach of the code of silence - SFCN contributors use pseudonyms.

Family court is unique. According to the Judicial Council of California, about 75 percent of all family court litigants statewide do not have a lawyer, most because they can't afford representation. Unrepresented, pro per litigants make up 70 percent of Sacramento Family Law Court users, according to the Sacramento County Family Law Facilitator. 

In family court, the parties are often embroiled, and the atmosphere emotionally charged. The lawyers and judges can become as irrational as the clients. Most judges don't want to be in family court and are there breaking in as a new judge or paying penance for past sins. Most are counting the days of fixed term family court assignments until they are reassigned downtown to hear civil or criminal cases. 

In Sacramento County, the current family court structure dates back to 1991 when controversial Judge Peter McBrien and attorneys from the Sacramento County Bar Association Family Law Section revamped family court operations. Court reform advocates assert that since that time, the public court effectively has been run by and for the private-sector financial interests of SCBA Family Law Section member attorneys

This eclectic mix of controversy, emotions, egos, disinterest and dysfunction provides a consistent stream of newsworthy events often overlooked, or deliberately ignored by traditional print and broadcast media.

We Want to Know What You Know About Family Court

We are very interested in hearing from court users, court clerks, bailiffs, court reporters, court administrators, judges and attorneys. Confidential communications are protected by the reporters’ privilege and the California Shield Law. See Cal. Const. article I section 2(b) and Cal. Evidence Code section 1070 [pdf]. Much of our original news content comes from confidential government and private sector sources. Please see our Contact page for additional information regarding our source protection policy.

How To Distinguish News, Analysis, Opinion and Satire Content

Like a traditional print newspaper, the content we publish is segregated as news, analysis, opinion, or satire. Analogous to the sections of a newspaper, at the end of each blog post are one or more labels designating the type of content in the post. A post containing news and analysis content might have labels like this:
Child custody - child custody and visitation - child support - child custody law - spousal support – alimony - child custody, domestic violence,  child support services – child support payments – child custody California – child custody law – child support payment – child support law – Divorce – attorney divorce – attorneys divorce – divorce attorney – divorce lawyer – divorce lawyers – lawyer divorce – lawyers for divorce – lawyer for divorce – domestic violence –
Sacramento Family Court News uses labels to identify news, analysis, opinion and satire content. 
Like a newspaper publisher, we generally segregate news content from other types of content like opinion, analysis, or satire. News content usually is distinct from opinion and satire, but may, where labeled, include analysis. If you spot a mislabeled article or post, please let us know.

Our Professional Standards & Anonymous Sources

We observe the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics and the Ethics in Journalism Policy of the New York Times. While we prefer to credit our news content sources, we observe the New York Times Confidential News Sources Policy when we use information provided by confidential or anonymous news sources. Due to a strong probability of retaliation, most of our sources request and are provided anonymity.  

Jacqueline Eston attorney - attorney Charlotte Keeley – family law - attorney Elaine Van Beveren – Sacramento - attorney Thomas Woodruff - attorney Richard Sokol – child custody - attorney Timothy Zeff – attorney Robert O’Hair – attorney Scott Buchanan – attorney Richard Gary - attorney Steve Burlingham – divorce - attorney Richard Gary – attorney Camille Hemmer – attorney Jackie Gevelinger – Carlson and Gevelinger family lawchild support – attorney Fredrick Rick Cohen – attorney Anthony Dick – attorney Dave Grotewohl – family law Gary, Till and Burlingham - family court Sacramento - attorney Jerry Guthrie – attorney Jackie Eston - attorney Mark Hughes – attorney Mary Molinaro – attorney Terri Newman – Carlson and Gevelinger - attorney John O’Malley –- attorney Diane Wasznicky - attorney Nancy Perkovich – attorney Donna Reed – attorney Stephen Wagner – family law Bartholomew and Wasznicky – family law – attorney Joseph Winn – attorney Tim Zeff – attorney Jacqueline Gevelinger – attorney Jackie Eston – Donna Gary – Legal Administrative Services  – Client Tickler software- – attorney Russell Carlson – attorney Paula Salinger – attorney Mark Ambrose – Larscheid Buchanan and Zeff - attorney Gary Appelblatt – attorney Bunmi Awoniyi – attorney Jeff Posner – attorney Hal Bartholomew – Family Law, Child Custody, Child Support, Family Court, Procedure, Sacramento Superior Court
Sacramento Family Court News uses the same 
family law references as judges and attorneys.
Despite ostensible protections provided by state whistleblower protection laws, the Judicial Branch of government in California has a well established history of retaliation against whistleblowers. 

In Sacramento County, employee whistleblower James Locke's career was destroyed and his termination orchestrated by court administrators, including controversial Family Law and Probate Director Julie Setzer and judges, including Jerilyn Borack, according to court records and media accounts. 

Nevada County Family Court whistleblower Emily Gallup suffered a similar fate when she attempted to report serial lawbreaking by coworkers. Family court litigants and attorneys who attempt to speak out about corruption also face retaliation in the form of illegal, adverse court rulings, court imposed financial hardship and homelessness, loss of contact with their own children, and even incarceration

For these reasons, we protect the identities of credible, reliable confidential sources. 
Our news analysis and opinion content is largely based on the family and civil law references used by judges and attorneys, including the California Practice Guide series published by The Rutter Group. Click here for a detailed description of the Sacramento Family Court News reporting references and newsroom law library. 

Corrections & How To Contact Sacramento Family Court News: 

Our goal is accuracy in all news content. If brought to our attention, all material factual inaccuracies in our news content will be corrected. Please see our Terms and Conditions page for further information. Send corrections, tips, comments, and concerns to:

Or use our CONTACT page. 

We support the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the California First Amendment Coalition and Californians Aware.

Bloggers' Rights at EFF

By using this site, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Click to visit Sacramento Family Court News on: Facebook, YouTube, Google+, Scribd, Vimeo, and Twitter.

Supreme Court of California – Chief Justice Tani G Cantil-Sakauye – Associate Justice Carol A Corrigan – Associate Justice Joyce L Kennard – Associate Justice Kathryn M Werdegar – Associate Justice Ming W Chin – Associate Justice Marvin R Baxter – Associate Justice Goodwin Liu – Justice Cantil-Sakauye –California Supreme Court - tani cantil-sakauye - The Honorable Joyce L. Kennard - The Honorable Marvin R. Baxter - The Honorable Kathryn M. Werdegar – Supreme Court of California - Chief Justice Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye -The Honorable Ming W. Chin The Honorable Carol A. Corrigan - The Honorable Goodwin Liu – The Honorable Tani Cantil-Sakauye -Current California Supreme Court Justices – Justice Cantil-Sakauye – California Supreme Court
Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, chief justice of the California Supreme Court, is a former Sacramento County Superior Court judge. Goodwin Liu, Kathryn Werdegar, Joyce Kennard, Carol Corrigan, Marvin Baxter and Ming Chin are associate justices on the Supreme Court of California

Case Law Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory