Showing posts with label JUDGE MISCONDUCT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JUDGE MISCONDUCT. Show all posts

04 April 2022

JUDGE THADD BLIZZARD: Judge with Priors for Ignoring State Law Ignores New State Law

Sacramento County Judge Thadd Blizzard, who ignored state law and effectively aided and abetted a child abduction when he was assigned to family court, is once again issuing decisions that are contrary to law, according to court watchdogs.  

The Davis Vanguard reports that Blizzard claims to have found a loophole to allow him to disregard a new state law that provides for a pretrial diversion program for most misdemeanor DUI cases.   

One of the exclusions is not misdemeanor DUI. Attorneys in Sacramento note that Judge Thadd A. Blizzard has pointed to a decades-old vehicle code provision to deny diversion for misdemeanor DUI cases.

One attorney described his client as a perfect candidate, with no record and a good job, impressive references, and a blood alcohol level barely over the legal limit who was pulled over for an equipment violation. In this case, the attorney and client went to the DMV and challenged the license suspension, based on evidence that he was not driving with a blood alcohol level of .08 percent or higher.

Still, Judge Blizzard pointed to an old vehicle code provision under section 23640 that says a person can’t enroll or participate in a treatment program to put their case on hold and eventually have the case dismissed.

Read the story at The Davis Vanguard. 


24 March 2022

Identify Judge Misconduct Using the California Judicial Conduct Handbook: News You Can Use

CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS YOU CAN USE: When the California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) investigates a judge accused of misconduct, this is one of the resources they use. 

If you believe you are a victim of judge misconduct, before you make a complaint to the CJP use the California Judicial Conduct Handbook to identify what the misconduct is called and the terminology used to describe it. This will significantly increase the odds that your CJP complaint will succeed.  


Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

20 March 2022

VIRAL VIDEO: Bay Area Family Court Private Judge Threatens Reporters, Refuses Access To Court Records

Support investigative reporting on family court corruption by subscribing to investigative reporter Susan Bassi's YouTube Channel. From the description for this viral video with 91,000 views: 

"One nurse, several dogs, slammed doors and calls for police and security over private judge records. Private judges are lawyers or retired public court judges who are privately paid. We have been seeking access to their records under California Rules of Court 2.400 and state and federal open proceeding laws. Links to those laws can be found here."

The private judge in this video is Gilroy attorney Richard P. Roggia, State Bar #54430. California Judicial Branch whistleblowers allege that the superior courts are being privatized, with private sector, for-profit judges taking over many of the functions of public judges. 

The Second District Court of Appeal has criticized the practice of using for-profit private or temporary judges to privatize the courts:  

Judge James T. Ford of the Sacramento County Superior Court wrote that privately compensating temporary judging was probably criminal. "Penal Code section 94 bars judicial officers from accepting gratuities for performing public acts. Judges pro tempore [i.e., temporary judges] have identical powers as sitting judges, and their decisions are those of the court without any further intervention by sitting judges. Accordingly, they must be deemed judicial officers within the meaning of the section."
Judge Ford also wrote that privately compensating temporary judges was unethical under the California Code of Judicial Ethics...
Judge Ford wrote: "While clearly not adopted with this recent phenomenon in mind, the Code stands for an important principle: justice and money do not mix. Judging is not in any way a private function; it is a quintessential public function, and should be administered without regard to compensation of the judge." Judge Ford concluded by asking the Judicial Council not to authorize privately compensated temporary judges: "I urge the judiciary to recognize that privately compensating judges pro tempore is illegal and pernicious. We are not for sale, nor is the product of our labor."

Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

16 March 2022

Angelina Jolie - Brad Pitt Divorce: Conflict of Interest Judge Disqualification Court Filing

Verified Statement of Grounds for Objecting To and Requiring Disqualification of Temporary Judge Appointed in This Matter

Filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on August 7, 2020 in case number BD646058. Case title: In Re Marriage of ANGELINA JOLIE, Petitioner, and WILLIAM BRADLEY PITT, Respondent. 

-

Angelina Jolie v Brad Pitt:... by California Judicial Branch ...


Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

13 March 2022

Identifying and Understanding Judge Misconduct Using the California Judicial Conduct Handbook: News You Can Use

CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS YOU CAN USE: If you are a victim of judge misconduct, consumer protection experts recommend you read the California Judicial Conduct Handbook before you make a complaint to the state Commission on Judicial Performance. 

 

@susanbassi

Our investigation includes court file review, public records requests and interviews. This is the book all judges are given when elevated to the bench. The exception being private judges who are merely attorneys with the power and immunity of a public court judge only private judges are privately paid.

♬ original sound - SusanBassi

Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

18 May 2020

CONTROVERSIAL JUDGE MATTHEW GARY PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED BY COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE - NOW THREE-STRIKER

Prominent judge misconduct defense attorney James Murphy arranges sweetheart plea bargain ("stipulation") ending CJP prosecution. Under plea bargain, Gary admits to multiple acts of misconduct, reportedly in exchange for reduced punishment.

More complaints against Gary reportedly are in the pipeline to the Commission on Judicial Performance. Sacramento Family Court Report is conducting a rolling investigation of misconduct by Gary. If you have made a complaint, or are planning to make a complaint against the judge, contact us.

Read more about Judge Matthew Gary:



Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

04 April 2019

HORRIFIC FACTS OF NEW YORK DIVORCE CASE MIRROR TACTICS USED BY MANY SACRAMENTO COUNTY DIVORCE LAWYERS AND JUDGES, SAYS WHISTLEBLOWER

The federal lawsuit embedded with this post originates in a state court divorce case in New York. It describes illegal or unethical litigation tactics often seen in Sacramento County divorce and family court cases, according to local court watchdogs.

"The allegations in this new federal lawsuit, including misconduct by the judge, are virtually identical to what we've seen in Sacramento County for more than 20 years," said California judicial branch whistleblower Ulf Carlsson. "It is so bad here they made a documentary about the corruption. And Presiding Judge David De Alba has played deaf, dumb, and blind to the problems."

Learn more:

Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.


05 March 2019

SANTA ANA APPELLATE COURT JUDGE REPORTS ATTORNEY TO STATE BAR: MEANWHILE, SACRAMENTO FAMILY COURT JUDGES DEFY JUDICIAL ETHICS CANON 3D(2), IGNORE, COVER UP ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT

Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

20 October 2017

16-YEAR RUN OF SERIAL MISCONDUCT BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JUDGE BRUCE MILLS BLAMED ON CODE OF SILENCE, COVER UPS BY COLLEAGUES

California 1st District Court of Appeal Justice J. Anthony Kline, Justice James A. Richman, Justice Therese M. Stewart, Justice Marla J. Miller First District Court of Appeal California Justice Miguel M. Marquez -Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Jill Fannin, Judge Steve Austin, Judge Bruce Mills, Judge Edward Weil, Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa - Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Bruce Mills is facing two new charges of misconduct by the Commission on Judicial Performance.

The CJP is the controversial state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and for disciplining judges.

From the East Bay Times Report:
MARTINEZ — A Contra Costa judge with a history of ethics violations was charged with judicial misconduct that could warrant his removal from the bench, records obtained Tuesday show.
The two counts of misconduct include allegations that Judge Bruce C. Mills illegally doubled the sentence of a judicial rights advocate who Mills had found to be in contempt of court. Mills jailed the man for discussing his divorce online, a decision that First Amendment experts called, “outrageous” and a free speech violation.
Mills has an apparently unprecedented five prior misconduct actions against him, bringing his running total to seven separate offenses over 16 years. The first incident occurred in 2001 when Mills refused to appoint an attorney for a criminal defendant, and "made comments that disparaged the defendant's version of the case and fostered the appearance that the judge was attempting to pressure the defendant into pleading guilty," according to the CJP. 

18 October 2017

JUDGE MATTHEW GARY REPORTEDLY IN SIGHTS OF STATE JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AGENCY FOR ILLEGAL JAILING OF FAMILY COURT PARENTS

UPDATE MAY 14, 2020: Judge Matthew Gary Prosecuted and Convicted by Commission on Judicial Performance.

Supreme Court of California Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Justice Goodwin Liu, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar,  Justice Leondra Kruger  California Supreme Court - California 3rd District Court of Appeal – Sacramento Justice Vance W. Raye – Justice Jonathan K. Renner - Justice Coleman A. Blease – Justice Ronald B. Robie – Justice William J. Murray Jr. – Justice George W. Nicolson – Justice M. Kathleen Butz – Justice Elena J. Duarte – Justice Harry E. Hull Jr. – Justice Louis R. Mauro – Justice Andrea Lynn Hoch – Justice Jonathan K. Renner Third District Court of Appeal
Sacramento County Superior Court watchdogs assert that Judge Matthew Gary is under investigation by the Commission on Judicial Performance and California State Auditor for ordering the illegal imprisonment of self-represented court users. In a similar case, Contra Costa County Judge Bruce Mills  recently was charged with ethics violations by the CJP. Gary reportedly has delayed his own day of reckoning with help from 3rd District Court of Appeal Presiding Justice Vance Raye, who has intervened to cover for Gary in the appellate court. 

Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

12 August 2017

JUSTICE ARTHUR G. SCOTLAND CONFESSES TO PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT LICENSE, MORAL TURPITUDE ACTS: 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL HISTORY

Justice Arthur G. Scotland with Justice George Nicholson from the controversial 3rd District Court of Appeal: Scotland admits to acts of moral turpitude, including serial unauthorized practice of law violations and disregard of the law as an employee of the Sacramento County District Attorney's Office.

Retired from the 3rd District Court of Appeal, Scotland now is Of Counsel at Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni LLP Sacramento office. For more information, visit the document embedded with this post.

Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers. 


Judge Jaime Roman Disqualification for Bias: Verified Answer to Challenge for Cause from 2013




Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

26 July 2017

Commissioner Peter McBrien Misconduct Prosecution by the Commission on Judicial Performance: Records Catalog


  • Judge Peter McBrien misconduct Commission on Judicial Performance prosecution documents catalog. 




Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.

09 March 2017

Justice Arthur Scotland: Federal Crimes Alleged by Sacramento Superior Court Whistleblowers - 18-page Catalog

Arthur Scotland criminal allegations catalog at issuu.
  • Read more about controversial 3rd District Court of Appeal Justice Arthur G. Scotland. 
  • Read more about the controversial 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento.



Read our Special Report: Sacramento County Family Court Operates as RICO Racketeering Enterprise, Charge Whistleblowers.